Notices

Search:

Type: Posts; User: Gerry Nightingale

Page 1 of 14 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. In reply to Physicist, re: your #7 reply. You...

    In reply to Physicist, re: your #7 reply.

    You are correct! Much of what I write w/regard to my own "pet theories" uses terms that NOT part of accepted physics terminology...because they don't...
  2. In reply to Physicist, re: your #9 post. Show...

    In reply to Physicist, re: your #9 post.

    Show me how one atom can be used to DIRECTLY observe another atom in a "real-time" state, and will I will retract my uninformed statement. IMO, what is...
  3. In reply to TFOLZO, re: your #5 post. As to...

    In reply to TFOLZO, re: your #5 post.

    As to the true state of atoms...everything is open to interpretation. There is no mechanism to actually observe an atom, and likely never will be, so the only...
  4. In reply to Physicist, re: your #56 post. ...

    In reply to Physicist, re: your #56 post.

    No...I don't think much of the idea of "velocity=energy" of a SINGLE particle. It seems the "idea" is popping-up here and there on threads in other...
  5. In reply to Physicist, re: your #2 post. You...

    In reply to Physicist, re: your #2 post.

    You mentioned that Feynman basically advocates, by intent or implication, that "energy is a constant". I write the same thing, as a logical QED posit, and...
  6. In reply to Physicist, re: your #92 reply. ...

    In reply to Physicist, re: your #92 reply.

    Many Thanks for #92!

    I absolutely did NOT write a "death threat" against anyone, at anytime, anywhere.

    "BwS" continuously re-writes "posts" to say...
  7. In reply to Physicist, re: your #54 post. I...

    In reply to Physicist, re: your #54 post.

    I meant "why does velocity serve as a pro-forma mandate of a given atoms ability to radiate energy". <(is this better?)

    (Cheerio!)
  8. In reply to SpeedFreek, re: your #87. ...

    In reply to SpeedFreek, re: your #87.

    "INDEED"?!?! I NEVER said "I am going to kill" ANYONE! This is a deliberate distortion and re-edit of I post that I did right. YOU are allowing BwS to...
  9. In reply to SpeedFreek, re: your #7 post. For...

    In reply to SpeedFreek, re: your #7 post.

    For the first time in a very long time, your post has rendered me completely senseless...I'm actually kinda' enjoying it, this feeling! This must be how...
  10. In reply to TFOLZO, re: your #1 post. Cheers!...

    In reply to TFOLZO, re: your #1 post.

    Cheers!

    What do you want me to say? A rebuke, perhaps? I don't have one...just what I've posted previously.

    I am of the opinion there is NO TIME as a...
  11. In reply to Speedfreek, re: post #50 & #55. ...

    In reply to Speedfreek, re: post #50 & #55.

    So....this is "all good?" Okay, then. I like knowing the what the rules are...unless of course, Beer/W Straw wants add an oblique reference to "pieces...
  12. In reply to Physicist, re: your post "links". ...

    In reply to Physicist, re: your post "links".

    In your years of reading, have you ever come across any explanation(s) of why "velocity of a particle serves as causation to alter it's "rest state"...
  13. Replies
    47
    Views
    2,176

    The answer is yes...but you must remember this a...

    The answer is yes...but you must remember this a "static" frame-of-reference, no influences can be introduced or any changes made.
  14. In reply to Physicist, re: your #8 post. ...

    In reply to Physicist, re: your #8 post.

    Sorry...my fault! I misinterpreted your meanings. You are correct, I should read everything in the series first, which I don't have, before I open my...
  15. In reply to SYA, re: your #84 post. Are you...

    In reply to SYA, re: your #84 post.

    Are you applauding yourself, or chastising me w/this post? I write "what logic and reason and Einstein" tell me is true...you are insinuating that some factor...
  16. In reply to SpeedFreek, re: your post #80. Do...

    In reply to SpeedFreek, re: your post #80.

    Do you mean the "forum as whole" or just this thread? Or are you saying you just want "book-thumpers" on the entire site, people who never write anything...
  17. In reply to Jilan, re: your #90 post. Of...

    In reply to Jilan, re: your #90 post.

    Of course, "energy is frame dependent" via the mechanisms of the actions of matter. (if you got the impression I'm advocating differently...I'm not.)

    I am...
  18. In reply to Jilan, re: your #88 post. Jilan, I...

    In reply to Jilan, re: your #88 post.

    Jilan, I am "chilled to the max" w/regard to my emotive dissonance...! (I just love using big words! Makes me feel like I'm smarter than I really am!)

    If...
  19. In reply to SpeedFreek, re: your #87 post. ...

    In reply to SpeedFreek, re: your #87 post.

    SpeedFreek, what you say regarding chromatic shift due to rotational vectors is true, but NOT for the reason you think it is true. The emitted photons...
  20. Replies
    47
    Views
    2,176

    In reply to chaimc, re: your post #8. I am not...

    In reply to chaimc, re: your post #8.

    I am not encouraged to see you say "good-bye" merely because of my own perceptions. There is much to be "learned" here regarding physics theory...but you must...
  21. In reply to SpeedFreek, re: your #85 post. ...

    In reply to SpeedFreek, re: your #85 post.

    Referring me to "Dick and Jane" primers will not convince me that Einstein was wrong...this IS the direct implication of XoX's posts in regard to the...
  22. Replies
    11
    Views
    1,698

    "Magic" particles w/"magic" abilities seem to...

    "Magic" particles w/"magic" abilities seem to clear the entire question up...if a particle can "travel backward in time" and "make more different particles from itself" which in turn means

    these...
  23. In reply to SYA, re: your #78 post. I stand...

    In reply to SYA, re: your #78 post.

    I stand with what I wrote, and as per many of my other posts, I do agree that the postulated behaviors of theoretical particles stipulate that "time" is...
  24. Replies
    11
    Views
    1,698

    In reply to StevenS, re: your #1 post. Cheers!...

    In reply to StevenS, re: your #1 post.

    Cheers!

    I think a Star would "fit the bill" for a continuous production method.


    (Thanks for reading!)
  25. Replies
    47
    Views
    2,176

    In reply to chaimc, re: your #1 post. I...

    In reply to chaimc, re: your #1 post.

    I believe you describing a "camera obscura" scenario. You should be able to easily find out about this w/ any search engine. I would be happy to describe...
Results 1 to 25 of 341
Page 1 of 14 1 2 3 4