Notices
Results 1 to 12 of 12
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Jilan

Thread: Star at the edge of the universe

  1. #1 Star at the edge of the universe 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    997
    I was wondering if the Wheeler-Feynman Absorber Theory had any bearing on why the universe is undergoing accelerated expansion?

    Wheeler

    If there were no emission without absorption would the light emitted by a star on the edge of he universe be constrained to move inwards away from the edge of the universe? By conservation of momentum would the star be forced to move outwards? Is anyone aware of any papers that that discuss this?
    MaxPayne likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member AlexG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    161
    There's no inward, there's no outward, there's no edge to the universe.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    997
    Quote Originally Posted by AlexG View Post
    There's no inward, there's no outward, there's no edge to the universe.
    So everything is on the surface then? Same deal possibly?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Junior Member PM_ME_URANUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    6
    The surface of what?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    997
    You may have come across the analogy of a balloon covered in dots. When you blow it up all the dots move further part from each other. No dot is on the edge so to speak.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member MaxPayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    India
    Posts
    236
    How do you relate the two?
    ┻━┻ ︵ヽ(`´)ノ︵ ┻━┻
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    997
    It beats me!
    Anyone know?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    341
    In reply to Jilan, re: your #1 post.

    If you consider there is a "boundary" of some sort, say a metric tensor...would that mean there is something of a lesser value on the other side? I would think so, following the principle

    of "greater to lesser". Perhaps a "void" circumstance exists outside of the continuum of the Universe, creating a "pull" effect.<(this is presuming there is an "outside" continuum)


    (Thanks for reading!) Cheerio!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    997
    Thanks Gerry, the unverse itself is said to have a metric and space itself is expanding. Like a loaf of raisin bread expanding in the oven.
    Metric expansion of space - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    I was quite enamoured with the pull idea and many years ago dropped a line to Steven Hawkin about it, but he never got back to me
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    341
    In reply to Jilan,re: your #9 post

    The only other possibility I could dredge up from the dank recesses of file cabinets in my head is a theory I read about twenty years ago called "negative gravity...I don't remember the

    particulars, but I think it involved something like an unprocessed film-negative, in gravity has an "unfinished" aspect that mirrors "positive gravity"...I've looked all over w/ Bing and

    Google, and I can't find any sources for it, but I'm sure I read it in a magazine somewhere! (it might have been something in sci-fi)


    (Thanks for reading!) Cheerio!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    997
    I've been investigating the balloon analogy and am wondering if the surface of the balloon is to represent our 3d space then the universe would need to be a hypersphere (or another hyper object at least) of a higher dimensionality.
    The Shape of the Universe (part 1): the Hypersphere | LSNED
    There does not seem to be a lot to go though
    Travelling to the edge of the Universe, 4th Dimensional Time Travel

    If EM radiation were 4 dimensional would it be able to inflate the balloon so to speak?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    341
    In reply to Jilan, re: your #11 post.

    I don't mind admitting I'm more than a little confused by "expansion", especially w/regard to very distant observations. The single aspect that troubles me most is the possible

    make-up of the "film of the bubble", the tensor...where does it start? And what is it's composition? Is it just an invisible gradient factor...or something the 4-d you mentioned could exert a

    steady pressure on?


    (Thanks for reading!) Ta ra!
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •