Notices
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Explaining Black Hole Jets and the Sun's Sunspots

  1. #1 Explaining Black Hole Jets and the Sun's Sunspots 
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7
    Yes, it took me two years to write this book. I started off wanting to write about the Ice Age. In seeing how astronomy affected the ice Age I looked at the Sun and then Black Holes. I was intrigued especially the jets. I learned that the jets composed of iron and nickel particles so magnetism had to be involved. I studied how to calculate magnetism and finally I decided I got the answer to the jets. well, I decided to publish the book to let people know how to calculate the jets and also realized that the Sunspots were the same phenomenon. Read the my book. It is all Newtonian physics and Maxwell formulas. Very simple. Just high school and college math. No need for Einstein General Theory of Relativity.

    P.S. The book is available at Amazon or Chapters. The book title is the same as the title of this post. I showed the girl at the bookstore a copy of my book and she said: cool!"
    Last edited by Blackholejets; 08-22-2017 at 01:11 AM.
     

  2. #2  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7
    1. Find out why the sun's surface is cooler than the corona
    2. Find out how a sunspot forms
    3. Find out why black holes emit radio wave, x-rays in addition to jets
    4. Find out why the solar wind speed is 800 km/s
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    230
    Quote Originally Posted by Blackholejets View Post
    I showed the girl at the bookstore a copy of my book and she said: cool!"
    Well, that's almost as good as peer review.
    You can do everything right, strictly according to procedure, on the ocean and it'll still kill you, but if you're a good navigator at least you'll know where you were when you died.
     

  4. #4  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7
    I showed her the book and she saw the title. She is a student going to university pretty soon. She works for the bookstore. Unfortunately they only have online sales and didn't have any book in the store.
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    230
    As you provide no details, I have no idea whether your book is a good summary of existing science or a load of nonsense that you have invented.

    The fact that you claim that the jets can be explained using simple math suggests it is the latter. The mechanisms are not fully understood even by experts in the field. And it almost certainly does require a knowledge of general relativity.
    You can do everything right, strictly according to procedure, on the ocean and it'll still kill you, but if you're a good navigator at least you'll know where you were when you died.
     

  6. #6  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7
    Nothing ventured nothing gained. Your lack of curiosity is very telling. You worship in the temple of General Relativity which is only a theory. The electromagnetic force is 10^40 times stronger than gravity. Relativity only deals with this weak force. There is no fact based development in GR. It is developed from Energy Conservation i.e. Lagragian. They were trying to emulate LaGrange elegant theory which showed Newton's mechanical forces could be derived from energy conservation. Another thing gravitational attraction is maximum at the surface of any celestial body which are spherical. Inside the surface the gravity is converted to pressure and zero gravity at the center. The current black hole theory absolutely ignores this which is taught in college physics and theorizes about a singularity and disappearance to a singularity. Well the North pole is a singularity. Anything disappeared. No just the mathematical lines. It is just theoretical idea. You are just wedded to this GR theory. Einstein is great scientist but he is not infallible. Already quantum physicists don't agree with Einstein. In time his halo will be less bright and science can progress again unencumbered by this unwieldy theory.
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    230
    Quote Originally Posted by Blackholejets View Post
    You worship in the temple of General Relativity which is only a theory.
    There is no such temple.

    And "only a theory" shows that you have zero understanding of science. A theory is the highest level of confirmation available in science. A theory that is well tested as GR is often described as "proved" by non-scientists.It is certainly the closest to "proof" that you get in science.

    The electromagnetic force is 10^40 times stronger than gravity.
    Meaningless. It depends on distance, mass, charge. There is minimal electromagnetic force between the Earth and the Moon, but enough gravity to maintain the moon in orbit and raise tides on Earth.

    Relativity only deals with this weak force.
    Yes, because we have other theories that deal with other forces.

    That is almost as stupid as complaining that the theory of evolution doesn't explain rainbows.

    There is no fact based development in GR.
    I don't really know what tat means. But as GR is tested against evidence and observation (i.e. facts) it would appear to be wrong.

    Already quantum physicists don't agree with Einstein.
    Citation needed.

    In time his halo will be less bright and science can progress again unencumbered by this unwieldy theory.
    Any future theory will have to be compatible with GR (because GR describes reality). Any such theory is not going to developed by some random guy on the internet.
    You can do everything right, strictly according to procedure, on the ocean and it'll still kill you, but if you're a good navigator at least you'll know where you were when you died.
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    230
    I don't know if there are still any moderators on this forum but I have reported your post so it can be moved where it belongs. (Trash probably.)
    You can do everything right, strictly according to procedure, on the ocean and it'll still kill you, but if you're a good navigator at least you'll know where you were when you died.
     

  9. #9  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7
    It is just your opinion. The higher they are the the greater the fall. If you haven't read my book then you have no case against the book just prejudice.
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    230
    Quote Originally Posted by Blackholejets View Post
    It is just your opinion.
    Nope. It is science. In other words, supported by evidence.

    If you haven't read my book then you have no case against the book just prejudice.
    You could present your idea here to allow it to be considered and discussed. Or you could continue to behave like a typical Internet crank. Your choice.

    I am certainly not going to pay for a book that is almost certainly full of crap.
    You can do everything right, strictly according to procedure, on the ocean and it'll still kill you, but if you're a good navigator at least you'll know where you were when you died.
     

  11. #11  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7
    Again it is just your opinion. You are entitled to your opinion.
     

  12. #12  
    Senior Member Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    230
    Quote Originally Posted by Blackholejets View Post
    Again it is just your opinion. You are entitled to your opinion.
    Nope. Science is based on EVIDENCE not opinion.
    You can do everything right, strictly according to procedure, on the ocean and it'll still kill you, but if you're a good navigator at least you'll know where you were when you died.
     

  13. #13  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7
    My evidence are the jets which are explained and calculated in my book. Whether you seek the answer or not is up to you. I think this is turning into an Abbott and Costello situation where they debate about "Who's on first". Carry on buddy.
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •