Notices
Results 1 to 11 of 11
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By tk421

Thread: 4th dimension or 4th generation?

  1. #1 4th dimension or 4th generation? 
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    45
    (DE*(Up Quark/electrical energy)) /C= (.683*(2.3/.3333333333)/299792.5))=4.9

    (DE *(Down Quark/electrical energy))/C=(.683*(4.8/.666666666)/299792.5))=4.9

    (DE* (UP Quark+Down quark))/C= (.683*(2.3+4.8)/299792.5))=4.9

    DM* SQRT. of C=4.9

    could Dark Matter be matter that is simply traveling at a speed of a magnatude faster or slower than normal matter?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member AlexG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    161
    Numerology.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    45
    How is that numerology? Not one of those numbers are mine. They are Scientific Facts.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    551
    Quote Originally Posted by David Hawkins View Post
    (DE*(Up Quark/electrical energy)) /C= (.683*(2.3/.3333333333)/299792.5))=4.9

    (DE *(Down Quark/electrical energy))/C=(.683*(4.8/.666666666)/299792.5))=4.9

    (DE* (UP Quark+Down quark))/C= (.683*(2.3+4.8)/299792.5))=4.9

    DM* SQRT. of C=4.9

    could Dark Matter be matter that is simply traveling at a speed of a magnatude faster or slower than normal matter?
    When are you going to stop posting this nonsense? It's not related to physics in any way, shape or form. They keep warning you about it and I sit by hoping that you'll pay attention. This is a privately owned and operated forum so please stop thinking about this as your own personal soap box where you can explore freedom of speech. That's not what freedom of speech has ever mean to mean!

    Cripes! Anybody, even a child, can break out a calculator and juggle numbers like you've been doing. It means nothing to anybody who's interested in physics and has no theoretical basis so there's nothing that can be done with it other than sat "Oooo! Is that what you did with your calculator today?"

    I know as a fact that I can seek out and find measurements taken from objects around the world and find numerical relationships between them and those too would mean nothing.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    45
    Someone Replied that I had "finally hit on something interesting." "..the mass (x) energy modulator is a constant."
    Can someone explain to me what it means?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    392
    Quote Originally Posted by David Hawkins View Post
    How is that numerology? Not one of those numbers are mine. They are Scientific Facts.
    Does your attempt at refutation make sense to you? If so, you should be deeply concerned about your logical apparatus.

    What makes your mania an act of numerology is what you do with the numbers, not whether or not the numbers are "Scientific Facts." We have already pointed out to you -- several times, now -- that one must, at minimum, obey dimensional consistency, if you wish to compare two numbers. In short, two numbers are automatically incommensurate if their units are different. Two apples <> two oranges <> two members of the royal family. You continue to ignore this basic requirement. That's what makes what you're doing numerology, and that's why your posts keep getting tossed into the bin.

    Note that dimensional consistency is a necessary, but not sufficient, requirement. But you're not even satisfying the necessity criterion.

    ETA: Tell me if 3 kilograms is greater than, less than, or equal to 72.4 wakalixes. How about 0.0724 kilowakalixes? Explain.
    Last edited by tk421; 09-26-2014 at 01:30 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    551
    Quote Originally Posted by David Hawkins View Post
    Someone Replied that I had "finally hit on something interesting." "..the mass (x) energy modulator is a constant."
    Can someone explain to me what it means?
    It means that you were hallucinating. Otherwise where was this said?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    45
    The (x) mass energy modulator is 3.14159
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    392
    Quote Originally Posted by David Hawkins View Post
    The (x) mass energy modulator is 3.14159
    I think you mean this: Q-36 Space Modulator - YouTube
    Boing3000 likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    997
    Quote Originally Posted by David Hawkins View Post
    The (x) mass energy modulator is 3.14159
    The looks a bit like pi.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    997
    Quote Originally Posted by David Hawkins View Post
    Someone Replied that I had "finally hit on something interesting." "..the mass (x) energy modulator is a constant."
    Can someone explain to me what it means?
    Hey, that was me, sorry I only just realised what you were talking about. I think you meant that the modulus of the mass x charge is a constant. It means that the ratio of the up quark mass to the down quark mass is in proportional to the ratio of (the modulus) of their charges. We discussed it here.
    The Three Generations of Quarks are directly Related to Dark energy and Dark matter
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •