Notices
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Electric Charge in the Standard Model of particle physics

  1. #1 Electric Charge in the Standard Model of particle physics 
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    4
    Hi!

    The following asks a basic question in the Standard Model of particle physics, Any answers?

    "Should the Standard Model of Particle Physics Have Merely a Conventional Definition of the Electric Charge ?"

    ( for further discussion see: vixra.org/abs/1409.0118 )
    Syed Afsar Abbas
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Administrator Markus Hanke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    1,378
    "Should the Standard Model of Particle Physics Have Merely a Conventional Definition of the Electric Charge ?"
    I don't know what you mean by "conventional definition", but in particle physics charge arises naturally as the conserved Noether current associated with the gauge invariance of the electromagnetic field, specifically the invariance of the squared norm of the wave function of a charged particle under phase shifts. This is mathematically rigorous through Noether's theorem, and works very well.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    4
    Electric Charge in the Standard Model of particle physics
    Yes. However Noether Theorem says nothing about quantization of the electric charge.
    Quantization means, why is u-quark charge -2/3 of the electronic charge etc ?
    in the Standard Model of Particle Physics, this is defined quite arbitrarily. There are, in practice,
    two popular conventions: Q= T3 + Y/2 and Q= T3 + Y" , where T3 and (Y or Y") are generators
    of the Electro-Weak group SU(2)XU(1) respectively. Next Y and Y" are arbirarily put in by hand to
    match the experiemental numbers for the various charges.

    This, for a fundamental and as successful a thoery as the Standard Model, is highly unsatisfactory.
    Clearly something is amiss in our understanding.
    Please also see: vixra.org/abs/1409.0118
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    x0x
    x0x is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    737
    Quote Originally Posted by Abbas View Post
    in the Standard Model of Particle Physics, this is defined quite arbitrarily.
    This is how the Standard Model is constructed, there is no secret about it. Your paper offers no explanation.

    Please also see: vixra.org/abs/1409.0118
    vixra is a repository for fringe papers that were rejected by mainstream physics. Pointing to your own paper (in a crank website) is considered bad form.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •