Notices
Results 1 to 22 of 22
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By pikpobedy
  • 1 Post By Jilan

Thread: How long will 1m of space be next year?

  1. #1 How long will 1m of space be next year? 
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    3
    Due to the expansion of space how long will 1m of space be next year?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    37
    I think that depends on where in space it's located.
    Crush a bit, little bit, roll it up, take a hit
    Feeling lit, feeling light, 2 AM, summer night
    My hands on the wheel, uhh, **** that
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Boing3000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    194
    Space cannot be measured, it has no length.

    Things have positions in space. Those can be differentiated to give up measure/length.

    So your good old meter stick will still be that in some million year.
    Maybe some value considered constant (like the speed of light) are not so constant over long period of time (experiment are running), making your meter stick no more standard. But it is unlikely.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    551
    Quote Originally Posted by swsmith View Post
    Due to the expansion of space how long will 1m of space be next year?
    1 m. 1 meter of space never changes. What changes is that there will be more meters of space in the universe.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    out there
    Posts
    306
    Base unit definitions: Meter
    The meter is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    997
    Perhaps the question is intended to ask how much will the space expand maybe? My understanding is that is it really really small. 0.7 km per million light years per second.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    3
    My question was intended to get a feel for the order of magnitude of the the expansion of space.
    I was under the assumption that space itself does actually expand and can even cause distant objects to exceed the speed of light relative to one another.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    out there
    Posts
    306
    You can look up what physicists state about:
    How old is the universe?
    What size was it when it started?
    What size was it after 1 picosecond, nanosecond, second, year, 100 thousand years, million years etc
    There is a period called inflation where expansion was extraordinarily rapid. (don't ask me I am just a bystander)
    How large is the visible universe now?

    diagram of the big bang expansion
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    3
    According to Jilans answer and a few quick calculations results in a meter of space expanding to 1.00000000000233m over one year.

    Thanks!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    out there
    Posts
    306
    a change of 2.33E-12, 2.33 pico meters in one year
    That's about the wavelength of some gamma rays, 1000 protons lined up or 1/30th of a helium atom.

    Does that even make sense?
    For one american billion years 2.33E-12 x 1E9 = 2.33E-3 = 2.33 mm
    Ten american billion years 2.33E-12 x 1E12 = 2.33E-3 = 23.3 mm
    Last edited by pikpobedy; 09-25-2014 at 04:15 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    997
    You know how compound interest works? We could try applying the same principle and see what that gives instead.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    out there
    Posts
    306
    Good one... Chuckle chuckle,
    Continuous compounding gives a 23.6 mm increase after 10 billion.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    997
    Are you compounding each second or each year?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    out there
    Posts
    306
    Continuous Compound Interest Formula
    The limit of the interval goes to zero. But you know that. snort.
    Jilan likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    997
    It doesn't seem very much does it?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    out there
    Posts
    306
    Jilan, you stated: 0.7 km per million light years per second.


    That is 2.33E-9 m/m per second
    Componded continuously for one year 1 meter goes to 1.076 meter. A 76 mm growth per year.

    Hmmmm. snort for this.and snort for all 2.33E-12 calculation.

    Your turn
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    997
    I think your calculation in post #12 looked right.
    Have you got a cold?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    out there
    Posts
    306
    Question becomes: How or where did you get "0.7 km per million light years per second"?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    997
    Oh I see, my mega-parsec conversion got screwed up! very sorry....
    Let's try again..... How does 23 km/s/million light years sound?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    out there
    Posts
    306
    Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me.
    I'll wait for the one meter for one year answer from you. This arithmetic is not enriching my life.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  21. #21  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    997
    I agree, it's best to save the brain cells for old age, we might need them but I just can't resist....
    I'm coming up with 7.7 x 10^-13 m/year/m
    Oh dear, it's even smaller! I don't think we humans are designed to work with such small numbers. lol.
    Maria likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  22. #22  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    out there
    Posts
    306
    Small numbers? Go for 16 point font. If not try 24. Yuk yuk yuk.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •